<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get Top 10 Rankings In 48 Hours</title>
	<link>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/</link>
	<description>Learn How To Make Money Online</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: blackstone91</title>
		<link>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>blackstone91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-507</guid>
		<description>very interesting article.

I do have a question tho.
My problem is that i have a site with competitive niche, and its hard to find keyword phrases under 1000 all in title competition and when I do find it either its not relevant (hits i wouldnt need or the search volume is pretty small).

What would u suggest then for volume search per month &#62; all in title ratio ? 1:1 or 1:2 still might be okay to target ?
Would u target those keywords that send 60 hits a month as well but are 4-5 word keyword phrases ?

Also I wanted to ask you would it be better to target in your title only the phrase like:

from your example
dish network satellite internet

or add a sentence like this for the title:
information about dish network satellite internet

I am wondering if there would be any change of hits(less hits) but maybe more clickable from surfer point of view since u re adding more words infront or behind a certain phrase?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting article.</p>
<p>I do have a question tho.<br />
My problem is that i have a site with competitive niche, and its hard to find keyword phrases under 1000 all in title competition and when I do find it either its not relevant (hits i wouldnt need or the search volume is pretty small).</p>
<p>What would u suggest then for volume search per month &gt; all in title ratio ? 1:1 or 1:2 still might be okay to target ?<br />
Would u target those keywords that send 60 hits a month as well but are 4-5 word keyword phrases ?</p>
<p>Also I wanted to ask you would it be better to target in your title only the phrase like:</p>
<p>from your example<br />
dish network satellite internet</p>
<p>or add a sentence like this for the title:<br />
information about dish network satellite internet</p>
<p>I am wondering if there would be any change of hits(less hits) but maybe more clickable from surfer point of view since u re adding more words infront or behind a certain phrase?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ktoby</title>
		<link>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>ktoby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-374</guid>
		<description>interesting and very useful. thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting and very useful. thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dish Network Hack - It's not worth it!</title>
		<link>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Dish Network Hack - It's not worth it!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>You info has pinpoint accuracy, of course you already knew this..lol

I submitted to digg, it took 6 minutes for me to get the 6th spot in Google. This article was about a Dish Network Hack, its insane how much attention Google is giving to digg, its the place to be right now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You info has pinpoint accuracy, of course you already knew this..lol</p>
<p>I submitted to digg, it took 6 minutes for me to get the 6th spot in Google. This article was about a Dish Network Hack, its insane how much attention Google is giving to digg, its the place to be right now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Money Using Paypal</title>
		<link>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Money Using Paypal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Wow that's some really great information there! I'll definetely give this a go, who knows digg may just be what I have been looking for. Of course it's just another great thing to add to my arsenal of traffic generation tools! but thanks again!
Richard Grimes
http://paycheckkiller.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow that&#8217;s some really great information there! I&#8217;ll definetely give this a go, who knows digg may just be what I have been looking for. Of course it&#8217;s just another great thing to add to my arsenal of traffic generation tools! but thanks again!<br />
Richard Grimes<br />
<a href="http://paycheckkiller.com" rel="nofollow">http://paycheckkiller.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Huan</title>
		<link>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Huan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Your posts are really professional and helpful. I'll give it a try. What an exciting thing if my site rank No.1 in Google. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your posts are really professional and helpful. I&#8217;ll give it a try. What an exciting thing if my site rank No.1 in Google. <img src='http://www.seoreef.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ti3n</title>
		<link>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>ti3n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>that is interesting. thks for the info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is interesting. thks for the info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulTimmons</title>
		<link>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulTimmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>The main idea is not about getting to the top page of Digg, the idea is to rank for certain keywords. Of course, it wouldn't hurt to get on Digg homepage, but that's a slightly irrelevant matter for the purpose of this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main idea is not about getting to the top page of Digg, the idea is to rank for certain keywords. Of course, it wouldn&#8217;t hurt to get on Digg homepage, but that&#8217;s a slightly irrelevant matter for the purpose of this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.seoreef.com/2008/03/12/get-top-10-rankings-in-48-hours/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>This is nice but nowadays..I stopped using Digg...for me it is really very hard to get it to the top page...I'm using propeller, sphinn and other sites aside from Digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nice but nowadays..I stopped using Digg&#8230;for me it is really very hard to get it to the top page&#8230;I&#8217;m using propeller, sphinn and other sites aside from Digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
